Shock to airport operators: SC will hear the petition filed concerning fixing cargo and floor dealing with costs

Shock to airport operators: SC will hear the petition filed concerning fixing cargo and floor dealing with costs


New Delhi:

The Supreme Court docket has determined to listen to the petition of Airport Financial Regulatory Authority (AERA) in opposition to fixing cargo and floor dealing with costs by airports. The Supreme Court docket accepted that AERA’s petition is hearable. The Supreme Court docket rejected the petition of Delhi, Mumbai and Bengaluru airports, which had sought preliminary dismissal of AERA’s petition.

what’s the matter

The Supreme Court docket has delivered its verdict on the powers of the Airport Financial Regulatory Authority (AERA) to control costs for non-aeronautical providers. This determination will have an effect on the airport amenities and subsequently the charges paid by passengers for the flight. The matter revolves round AERA’s jurisdiction over charges for providers indirectly associated to flight. Which incorporates parking, retail and floor dealing with operations at airports. This determination is prone to have a wide-ranging influence on each passengers and airport operators throughout the nation, as it might result in adjustments in the fee construction of varied airport amenities.

On September 24, the Supreme Court docket had reserved its determination on the problem of maintainability of the enchantment filed earlier than it by the Airport Financial Regulatory Authority (AERA) in opposition to the orders of TDSAT below the AERA Act 2008.

A bench led by Chief Justice of India (CJI) DY Chandrachud and comprising Justices JB Pardiwala and Manoj Mishra was listening to a petition difficult the telecom dispute settlement and appellate tribunal’s determination. It mentioned that AERA doesn’t have the authority to impose tariffs on Floor Dealing with Providers (GHS) and Cargo Dealing with Providers (CHS) operated by particular metropolis airport dealing with firms (resembling Delhi/Mumbai Worldwide Airport Restricted) or their contractors.

The Tribunal additionally held that GHS and CHS ought to be thought-about ‘non-aeronautical providers’ below the AERA Act 2008 and thus past the tariff setting powers of AERA.

Additionally read- Each the grownup ladies reside within the ashram on their very own free will…: Large aid to Sadhguru’s Isha Basis from the Supreme Court docket

Video: Maharashtra Meeting Elections: Eknath Shinde, CM face of Mahayuti, Devendra Fadnavis hinted


Thanks for taking the time to learn this text! I hope you discovered the data insightful and useful. Should you loved such a content material, please take into account subscribing to our e-newsletter or becoming a member of our neighborhood. We’d like to have you ever! Be at liberty to share this text together with your family and friends, who may additionally discover it fascinating.

WhatsApp Group Join Now
Telegram Group Join Now
Instagram Group Join Now

Leave a Comment